Tell you it’s real nice boppin along with no pain and
feeling that you’ve never had a bad day in your life and never will have. Then
suddenly you have pain. By pain I mean not the kind that animates the sensory
nerves and sends a jangling along the pathways to register as fire in the brain.
The pain I speak of has no fire, no jangling. It is the stunned silence after a
bomb blast, the clear-cutting of perception which the migraine would otherwise
occupy, the wide absence of tiny understandings. It is mortal pain without the
histrionics, agony without writhing. It is dumb, it is dumpf.
Wednesday, April 6, 2016
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
The Fighting Shy Rules of Stuff
- The acquisition of stuff must be monitored with vigilance, and whenever possible avoided.
- It is perfectly acceptable, and better than acceptable, to diminish your load of stuff periodically.
- You usually don’t need to buy something to solve a problem. This statement is necessary as thoughts of buying are almost a reflexive reaction to any new problem faced in daily life, whether a rusty chain (buy some oil) or a fresh new anxiety (pay a therapist).
- The urge to buy can usually be satisfied through circumvention, through making the thing wanted, for example, or renovating an old one, or borrowing one, or finding a lay alternative, rather than by buying new. The desire for a particular experience is often construed in the imagination as a desire to buy, probably because buying a thing, for so long associated with enjoyment of the thing by preceding it, has come to be imagined as the enjoyment itself.
- Yet, with very few exceptions, the enjoyment of new acquisition soon wears off, and the soul returns to the humdrum quotidian.
- The price of an object seldom includes—as it should when making the purchase decision--the cost of storing the item for years, the commensurate loss of living space, the psychological toll of schlepping it around, the embarrassment of seeing it sit idle, the worry of finding a big enough place to hold it, and others that should be obvious to the reader.
- The accumulation of many possessions diminishes the appreciation of few. One faces a choice: Many and worse or fewer and better.
- Love of less can be cultivated, is nobler in spirit, and cheaper.
- In modern life, very few tools—very few tools—are truly necessary to perform the tasks of daily living. What tools are not possessed can often be improvised.
- A borrowed item is a more efficient item, as because it is used by more users it is more often used.
- A truly needed and not-to-be-borrowed item can be purchased with others and shared in a group.
- The concept of private property is not considerably diminished by the loss of exclusivity. That is to say, you don’t lose possession of something because others get to use it. It is no less your possession simply because you have lost the exclusive use of it.
Conclusion: The theory of private
property is a powerful, a civilized, and a not-to-mention necessary idea. But
it can be taken too far.
Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Living Dangerously
I sometimes see my life as romantic. But then I remember
where I live.
The “house” that I have rented for many years—an interesting
structure—one of those bland fronts of a South Philly house that often shield peculiar
and sometimes rich lives from the glare of public knowledge. Long ago my little
place probably housed sailors or dockyard workers or longshoremen. Just a few
blocks away are the great piers that once serviced ocean-going freighters, the
street that was once a seething waterfront thoroughfare.
Photographs from the mid-19th century show this
street a maelstrom of activity: the dusty avenue thick with horses and wagons,
and thousands of carts bearing the freight of the tall ships whose masts tower
above the piers in the background. It was a close, active street, the kind of
street where the primary commerce of the international American trade once took
place—among men and small-scale vehicles, not cranes and mechanics and diesel
trucks. (I miss it, can you tell?) Now,
of course, Delaware Avenue is no such thing, but a six-lane boulevard of
stoplights and road rage, connecting the Sprawl Mart with the Home Repo and the
Super Stash. It’s a strip mall stuck in the only place the city could put it,
the only stretch of open retail-ready land within 10 miles.
But the houses around here remain largely what they were.
I’m pleased to live in a place where a house can reach 150 years of age, and
more, and still serve as a house, without making any great fuss about it. I
live amid scores and scores of these houses, and not even a block of suburban-style
mini-houses—vinyl siding, garages—can destroy the ambience.
However, I’ve known I must leave this place--the lust has
indeed wandered—and have wondered what circumstance would permit me a graceful
exit from this residence of six years. Last week I found it: The first floor
wall, long bowed outward into the alley, has in fact collapsed. I didn’t
realize this at first. My landlord spent the night here last week and we
couldn’t figure out why the furnace, which had run all night, had apparently
failed to heat the house by morning. Then we looked in the alley. A big brick
wall really does make quite a pile. We had only a piece of sheetrock between us
and the great outdoors.
This new development with the house takes its place
alongside other, older quirks of the structure. For example, the hole in the
bathroom floor that looks down into the kitchen.
Following the walll discovery came frantic calls to
contractors, several of whom came to give estimates. And they confirmed what
I’ve always told the owner about this place: Fixed up, it’ll sell at a huge
profit. I think he believes it now, and plans to sell. Which means I need to
find a new place to live.
Which is all right. I’ve decided, at least for now, that my
only safety is despair of safety. I seem to be happy only when in flight. So
once again into the wild blue yonder. So far the remaining two floors have not
tumbled. Just give me another two days.
Friday, October 17, 2014
Gone
Yesterday I
got up at 7, loaded the car with all kindsa bicycles, dropped off keys, drank
coffee, took medicine, and was outta the parking lot before the first person
showed up for work. The Geo purred like a kitten. I covered 500 miles and got a
subsantial part of the way there, listening to Bill Bryson the whole way.
Now two days away from the
job, two solid days hoofin it east, more than 1000 miles from the breezy grit
of Los Angeles. I’m in the big sweeping prairieland of New Mexico and the Texas
panhandle, where the scene goes white with dust whipped in the westerly
sirocco.
Glad to be gone, in fact.
How can I say it sucked because they were unfun, those people. One colleague in
particular, I desperately wanted to know as a friend. I tried repeatedly to open
some friendly connection with him. And every time I felt I was feeding his
not-so-secret belief that I was an imbecile. He looked at friendly gestures as
weakness. I tried until I despaired, and felt I no longer needed to play the earnest
suitor.
Random notes from the road
October 14, 2014
Got started from Tulsa
this morning and drove a humane 300 miles East to St. Robert, Mo, where now. Traveled the path of old 66,
locally now a superhighway called the Will Rogers Memorial Highway. A center
span of this highway is a toll road—possibly because it enters the Kickapoo
nation territory—but near Tulsa in the west and Springfield in the east,
passage is free.
Signboards, many of which
lay mangled after the recent winds, advertise things like “Visit the Catholic
Superstore!” and “When you die you will meet God,” appealing to some audience
you also might meet when you are dead, and identify. For God only knows who it
is now. There is great admonishment around here to repent and be ready, a nice
accompanying message to the harangue of death I was listening to while driving.
Bryson, of course. Whose base narrative line I am coming to believe is a random
Google search. Put it like this: The thread upon which he hangs his prose looks
more and more like a desultory sequence of diverted interests, of the sort you naturally fall into
when you aimlessly look stuff up on the Internet.
Certainly it’s the sort of
trap I fall into when on the Internet, where last night I started by looking up
pictures of the clothing worn by Otzi the Iceman, and proceeded thence by
incomprehensible steps to an account of Charlotte Bronte’s life, followed by
pictures of Charlotte Bronte, followed by the writing of Charlotte Bronte,
followed by exhaustion.
This search cascade did
yield the interesting photographs I sought of Otzi the Iceman and his marvelous
equippage. The tools and clothing found with him—indeed, the food in his
stomach and the once-glowing ember in a birch bark cannister—spoke much about
his life, his sustanance, his background, his mode of survival. And it occurred
to me to wonder how much he and I, both sole practitioners of our own highly
personal and self-invented technic, might have in common. Specifically I
wondered if his impulse to fashion a coat out of animal skins or a backpack out
of reeds or a carrying pouch out of birch bark, was somehow similar to my
desire for the cash-independent resourcefulness of my do-it-yourself camp stove
and my self-powered travel and my permanent auto-repairs with seine twine.
Otzi lived in a time
before economy. Sometimes I wish I did too.
Notes from the end of an era
When I think how little
anyone worried about the death of books, the death of bookstores, the death of
so much else of the commerce of culture—music, movies, newspapers, the live
singing and playing of music—I am moved to nostalgia even for that very
ignorance. How could we have known that in a short time, in so very short a
time, the markers among which we arranged our adult lives, the markers we were
just coming to grasp, would be gone. And not in any slow disintegration and
seeping loss of market share, but in a fantastic great implosion of beloved
institutions. How could have known we were the last of a great tradition that
would die tomorrow?
It takes an effort now, as
Bill Bryson would say, even to remember the relation we had with words, with
writers, before the Internet made it possible for anyone with an internet
connection to be seen by the world. One so much enjoyed curling up with a
newspaper on the train, or a book on the airplane. One correlated one’s travel
with the speed of reading, to see if a good paper could last the whole train
ride, or vice versa. One enjoyed knowing the great author was out there, somewhere,
at his rustic house in Vermont, and might be reached by correspondance through his publisher, and
might actually respond. One aspired to be that distant presence, in all its
vagueness and mystery. It was a smaller world but a more enchanting one. Typing,
reading by lamplight, by candlelight, writing in cursive, penmanship, the connoisseurship of inks and pens, all
now gone the way of the dial telephone, and with them a way of understanding and
interpreting the world, and more than that a way of expression.
And this from a man who
would never have claimed to be happy in those years. In fact he has never been
happier than now, in these later times, these post-internet times. He will not
therefore credit this great magic of the age with his improvement. And yet he
will also not claim it kept him down. He will only say—I will only say (this third person gets tedious)--that to the extent I could be helped by the rapid
retrieval of information, the Internet has helped me. It has made my mind
commensurate with the greatest in the land, as far as plain information is
concerned. It has given me instant answers to difficult questions, of which I
have many. And if those answers fail to satisfy my curiousity, I am consoled at
least in knowing they are the best available. It has made me less worried about
the strange questions I wish to ask. For even before I finish typing the
question in the search space, my exact question appears at my cursor in
anticipation.
So I'm really not that grateful to be here
Pardon me if I don’t see God’s
great charity in skipping my death in order to ordain a new destiny for me as a
staggering neuralgic. This hunger for gratitude around me, this discomfort with
any other response but humble endurance and thankfulness for the fulness of his
benevolence because I lived–-what is it but a salve to the horror of death? People
want to see this. It helps them believe that serious illness is really all for
the best. Is it magnanimous to see mercy in this condition? Is it the dog’s
still-wagging tail after a beating? Is it even sane to feel grateful?
No, I am not grateful. I
lived a life of constant physical challenge, both to better my health as a
child and to foster a vigorous old age. I was cheated of both. I am not
grateful for being here and I am not happy. God’s real gift would have been to
take me when I fell. I do not live each day as it comes and I do not live in
the fullness of his bountiful plan. I live in rage. I will not be happy until
the vigor I enjoyed as a 55-year-old returns to me, or He, in his divine
justice, finds more amusement elsewhere and lets me go.
I do thank him for taking
an already vivid sense of tragedy, an instinct for sarcasm, and developing it,
elongating it, elevating it to a level of truly cosmic pretensions. Laughter is
laughter, however biting.
Simple Gifts
Tis a gift to be crippled,
tis a gift to be still
Tis a gift to sit right
through the fire drill.
I crept down this morning and
I sat on the stoop,
And I waited all day for
some help to poop.
Sit then, you’re weaker
than it seems,
My little prank will
engulf all your dreams,
And I’ll hold you still when you want to flee,
For I am the Lord of the Joke you see.
For I am the Lord of the Joke you see.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)